JP Morgan Chase Settles Robo-Signing Charges For $50 Million, Tax Deductible

The U.S. Trustee struck a $50 million deal over charges JPMorgan Chase ‘robo-signed’ mortgage documents to numerous bankruptcy courts. The bank must pay more than 25,000 homeowners in the remedial deal. As a result, there appears to be no restriction on the bank’s ability to write off the entire amount on its taxes. Speaking of taxes, the case and its subject matter contains important reminders for everyone at tax time.

The robo-signing in question involved bank employees who affixed electronic signatures–under penalties of perjury–without reviewing the accuracy of the notices. Sound familiar? At tax time, with virtually everything electronic, it can be tempting not to print out a tax return and not to read every line. If your preparer gave it to you and he or she has your records, you might think there’s no need.

JPMorgan-Dimon-e1404255574255

Be careful. You would have better luck with Tim Geithner’s TurboTax defense. The robo-signer defense goes something like this: “I didn’t read my tax return—I just signed it.” After all, more than half of all tax returns are prepared by someone else. Even members of Congress who write the tax laws don’t prepare their own. But before you sign under penalties of perjury, review it carefully.

In simple mechanics, there is marked contrast between the mechanics of paper vs. electronic filing. A taxpayer with a traditional paper filing at least must sign the return before mailing, and that imports a certain amount of due diligence. But with e-filing, the taxpayer may not even see the return.

The taxpayer should review the return, and the return preparer should ask the client to verify that all figures are correct, the correct boxes are checked, and so on. The lack of a signature in the traditional ‘affix your John Hancock’ sense makes it easier for mistakes to occur. In the old days, at least the return had to be printed out and the taxpayer had to actually sign it.

Now, the authorization form may be signed days before, and the final return as submitted may be significantly different from what the client saw.  The client may be able to say with a straight face—like the bank execs signing foreclosure docs—“who knew?” But the IRS says electronically filing counts as a signature. See Signing Your Electronic Tax Return.

Our tax law has been around since 1913, and the “I didn’t read it” defense has been tried before. But courts have consistently ruled that taxpayers have a duty to read their returns to ensure that all income is included. Since 1928, courts have held that even if all data is furnished to the return preparer, the taxpayer still has a duty to read the return. See Mackay v. Commissioner (1928).

Reliance on a preparer is not a defense if the taxpayer’s cursory review of the return would have revealed errors. See Metra Chem Corp. v. Commissioner (1987). With the advent of electronic filing, some taxpayers and preparers hit ‘send’ before the return is ready. Maybe it happened in the old days, but not to the degree it does now. It may be years before someone wins with a robo-signer defense. In the meantime, try to stay away from it. Look how much it cost JP Morgan Chase.

For alerts to future tax articles, follow me on Forbes. You can reach me at Wood@WoodLLP.com. This discussion is not intended as legal advice, and cannot be relied upon for any purpose without the services of a qualified professional.

via The Tax Lawyer http://ift.tt/1NkBaUi

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s